Navigation Menu

PUBLICATIONS

THE AUTOMATED PUBLIC SPHERE
Frank Pasquale - December 2017

Jonny Lindner/Pixabay

DOWNLOAD FULL TEXT  (English)

DOWNLOAD FULL TEXT  (German)


Other publications in "Political Analysis and Alternatives"

THE FAR RIGHT IN GOVERNMENT
Stefanie Ehmsen und Albert Scharenberg (Hrsg.)
June 2018

MAPPING THE RESISTANCE
Ethan Young
May 2018

LEFT DEMOCRATS IN SEARCH OF ANTI-TRUMP STRATEGY
Albert Scharenberg
March 2018

By Frank Pasquale. The ubiquity of the internet today—namely of social media networks and large search engines—has complicated the ways in which content is produced and received, deeply altering how society thinks about the rights to free speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of expression. Public speech can now easily be spread worldwide while remaining anonymous. Nazi-related content liable to prosecution in Europe is safely hosted on US servers where it is protected by the First Amendment. On top of this, our access to content has become completely mediated by algorithms designed to maximize profits. This transformation in the production, distribution, and consumption of content has become the inexorable backdrop of contemporary debates on the basic right to freedom of speech.

As automation emerges as a problem affecting all spheres of production, we are increasingly confronted with its ethical implications. This is especially true for the discussions spurred by the new digital contexts that shape public opinion. The automation of decision-making processes put in motion by digital platforms in sensitive areas such as editing, moderating, advertising, and circulating information is at the source of many controversies. When the ways in which information and opinion are produced and disseminated become open to manipulation, we are forced to deal with the consequences—an unregulated platform that takes advantage of the same capitalist logic that undermines society in so many other ways.

In this new piece, Frank Pasquale, affiliate fellow at Yale Law School’s Information Society Project and author of The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information, argues that powerful interest groups build their dominance with the help of a regulatory regime that permits secrecy and complexity. The study tackles events surrounding the recent US elections as well as other cases in which online interventions (or lack thereof) have allowed for the spread of hateful ideologies in the broader public. Presenting a series of legal and educational steps, the author shows how we may curtail the effects of the pathologies that the contemporary automated public sphere creates.

Disrupting secretive business strategies, preventing the concentration of power and money into a few hands, and introducing more instances of human intervention are initiatives that put the focus on regulating the power held by big tech companies. However, other proposed measures trigger crucial ethical considerations around this regulatory apparatus. How can we ensure that regulation does not turn into censorship, suppression, and thereby into another tool for manipulation and control of society?

Beyond fully endorsing these proposals or necessarily opposing all such forms of regulation, we believe that as progressive actors—many times on the losing end of digital control and/or harassment—we need to reconsider our strategies and methods under new contexts. How can we rethink regulation to make it work in both fair and transparent ways everywhere? Can we devise ways to regulate users, who play an important part in producing and distributing content, without falling into brute censorship? Are these desirable, forward-looking options, or rather desperate reactions to the reality of today’s digital world? Ultimately, we need to ask, what is the role of the internet in society today and how can we improve the digital environment for all of us?

DOWNLOAD FULL TEXT  (English)
DOWNLOAD FULL TEXT  (German)


Other publications in "Political Analysis and Alternatives"

THE FAR RIGHT IN GOVERNMENT
Stefanie Ehmsen und Albert Scharenberg (Hrsg.)
June 2018

MAPPING THE RESISTANCE
Ethan Young
May 2018

LEFT DEMOCRATS IN SEARCH OF ANTI-TRUMP STRATEGY
Albert Scharenberg
March 2018

NEWS / EVENTS

Flickr/VLLI

INTRODUCING THE JUST TRANSITION RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE

The Just Transition Research Collaborative (JTRC) is a joint project of the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung—New York Office, the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD), and the University of London Institute in Paris (ULIP). In this first iteration of our collaboration, we are excited to present the READ MORE

STAY UP TO DATE
Sign Up for our Newsletter

FOLLOW US
Socialism in Social Networks

FOLLOW US
Socialism in Social Networks

NEWS / EVENTS

Flickr/VLLI

INTRODUCING THE JUST TRANSITION RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE

The Just Transition Research Collaborative (JTRC) is a joint project of the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung—New York Office, the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD), and the University of London Institute in Paris (ULIP). In this first iteration of our collaboration, we are excited to present the Just Transition(s) Online Forum. This Forum seeks to bring together different stories and perspectives on the issue of Just Transition to low-carbon......
READ MORE

STAY UP TO DATE
Sign Up for our Newsletter

FOLLOW US
Socialism in Social Networks

FOLLOW US
Socialism in Social Networks

GLOBAL POWER AND RESISTANCE THE FUTURE OF LABOR SOCIAL MOVEMENTS AND EMANCIPATION POLITICAL ANALYSIS AND ALTERNATIVES