Navigation Menu

PUBLICATIONS

THE HARD FACTS ABOUT COAL
Why Trade Unions Should Re-evaluate their Support for Carbon Capture and Storage
Trade Unions for Energy Democracy - October 2015

Photo Credit: mjtmail (tiggy), Flickr

DOWNLOAD FULL TEXT  (English)


Other publications in "Projects"

UP FROM DEVELOPMENT
Rohan D. Mathews with Susana Barria & Ashim Roy
November 2016

THE STRUGGLE FOR A UN TREATY
Jens Martens and Karolin Seitz
August 2016

AN ILLNESS TO ONE IS THE CONCERN OF ALL
Trade Unions for Energy Democracy
July 2016

Trade Unions for Energy Democracy’s fifth working paper. Much hope has been placed in carbon capture and storage (CCS). Its proponents have included trade unionists, climate scientists, environmentalists, and governments looking for a way to greatly reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from burning coal and other fossil fuels. And indeed, this evolving technology promises to capture up to 90% of the CO2 produced by coal-fired power plants and to permanently bury it in stable geological formations deep underground.

However, the promise of CCS has so far gone unfulfilled. In fact, the potential of deploying CCS—and the support it receives from unions and others—has been used as political cover for the development of new coal infrastructure. It seems increasingly unlikely that CCS will ever be deployed at an adequate level, leaving us with a locked-in carbon infrastructure without the promised mitigation.

Even if CCS is deployed at adequate levels, the environmental damage done by extracting, transporting, and burning coal will not be eliminated by this technology. Indeed, the “energy penalty” associated with CCS means that coal’s impact on human health and the environment may even be increased. In this context, organized labor’s support for CCS allies it with the industry rather than with the frontline communities who are taking the lead in building a movement for climate and environmental justice.

In this TUED Working Paper, Sean Sweeney, the director of the International Program for Labor, Climate and the Environment at CUNY’s Murphy Institute, argues that rather than supporting CCS within a market-dominated energy context, the trade union movement should challenge the neoliberal framework of private control and unlimited growth and call for public and democratic control of the energy system. CCS may have a place in the transition to a post-carbon world, but this place must be determined democratically, and by public need, not by the narrow dictates of the market.

DOWNLOAD FULL TEXT  (English)


Other publications in "Projects"

UP FROM DEVELOPMENT
Rohan D. Mathews with Susana Barria & Ashim Roy
November 2016

THE STRUGGLE FOR A UN TREATY
Jens Martens and Karolin Seitz
August 2016

AN ILLNESS TO ONE IS THE CONCERN OF ALL
Trade Unions for Energy Democracy
July 2016

NEWS / EVENTS

WE ARE THE PEOPLE

Talking About Democratic Socialism 30 Years After the Fall of the Berlin Wall. Fall 1989 was a moment of radical transformation for the former German Democratic Republic (GDR). Already many GDR citizens had migrated to West Germany to escape state repression. On November 4, almost half a million other GDR citizens gathered at Alexanderplatz in Berlin for a peaceful protest,...
READ MORE

STAY UP TO DATE
Sign Up for our Newsletter

FOLLOW US
Socialism in Social Networks

FOLLOW US
Socialism in Social Networks

NEWS / EVENTS

WE ARE THE PEOPLE

Talking About Democratic Socialism 30 Years After the Fall of the Berlin Wall. Fall 1989 was a moment of radical transformation for the former German Democratic Republic (GDR). Already many GDR citizens had migrated to West Germany to escape state repression. On November 4, almost half a million other GDR citizens gathered at Alexanderplatz in Berlin for a peaceful protest, calling for the democratization of the socialistic state. Organized by......
READ MORE

STAY UP TO DATE
Sign Up for our Newsletter

FOLLOW US
Socialism in Social Networks

FOLLOW US
Socialism in Social Networks

GLOBAL POWER AND RESISTANCE THE FUTURE OF LABOR SOCIAL MOVEMENTS AND EMANCIPATION POLITICAL ANALYSIS AND ALTERNATIVES